Skip to content

Free Range Report

Preserving Our Western Outdoor Heritage

  • Who we are
  • Topics
    • latest_news
    • BLM
    • Human Rights
    • Resources
    • Property Rights
    • Public Lands
    • Domestic Energy
    • Environment

Bad federal policies, environmentalist lawsuits behind worsening wildfires

by editor | Posted on November 17, 2017October 4, 2018

“While it is possible that climate change has played a role in increasing the size of fires, the primary cause seems to be forest management practices, which have changed several times over the course of the past 200 years,” the study said.

Jarrett Stepman

The Daily Signal

The massive fires that took the lives of over 40 people in California were not the only devastating wildfires as of late.

Utah, Montana, and other states have been hit by destructive infernos that have left death and widespread property damage in their wake.

Forest fires—what firefighters call wildland fires—are undoubtedly a part of nature and can never be stopped entirely, but the measurable uptick in extraordinarily large fires is a trend that is causing intolerable amounts of damage.

Forest management policy has become calcified and centralized over the last half century, but there are some serious ideas that can turn things around.

Since the 1970s, the number of forest fires in the United States has remained fairly constant, but there’s been a significant uptick in the size of these blazes. The average wildfire is now twice the size of fires of 40 years ago.

Some have tried to pin the blame on climate change, but as a 2015 Reason Foundation study noted, climatic factors like higher temperatures and increased droughts “cannot explain the pattern of fires observed over the past century.”

“While it is possible that climate change has played a role in increasing the size of fires, the primary cause seems to be forest management practices, which have changed several times over the course of the past 200 years,” the study said.

The United States Forest Service, which manages most of America’s wilderness, made some big changes in the 1970s that many say have led to our modern predicament.

The selective clearing of forests, in which only certain trees are removed, had been highly successful in the past. But perverse incentives for the agency made clear-cutting, or uniformly chopping down trees, more common in the 1950s. This led to a backlash of lawsuits, environmentalist attacks, and unfortunately, more centralization in Washington for the Forest Service.

“In 1976 Congress tried to resolve the debate by instituting a comprehensive forest planning process,” wrote Randal O’Toole, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute. “The resulting plans proved to be a costly mistake: The agency spent more than a billion dollars planning the national forests, but the plans were often based on fabricated data, and they did not resolve any debates.”

Nearly a half century of bureaucratic centralization and environmentalist initiatives have left forests overgrown, vulnerable to fire, and dangerous to individual property owners and the economies of many states.

California state Sen. Mike McGuire, a Democrat, estimated that the recent fires may have caused over $3 billion in damages to his state.

The massive fires that took the lives of over 40 people in California were not the only devastating wildfires as of late.

Utah, Montana, and other states have been hit by destructive infernos that have left death and widespread property damage in their wake.

Forest fires—what firefighters call wildland fires—are undoubtedly a part of nature and can never be stopped entirely, but the measurable uptick in extraordinarily large fires is a trend that is causing intolerable amounts of damage.

Forest management policy has become calcified and centralized over the last half century, but there are some serious ideas that can turn things around.

Americans need an alternative to the mainstream media. But this can’t be done alone. Find out more >>

Since the 1970s, the number of forest fires in the United States has remained fairly constant, but there’s been a significant uptick in the size of these blazes. The average wildfire is now twice the size of fires of 40 years ago.

Some have tried to pin the blame on climate change, but as a 2015 Reason Foundation study noted, climatic factors like higher temperatures and increased droughts “cannot explain the pattern of fires observed over the past century.”

“While it is possible that climate change has played a role in increasing the size of fires, the primary cause seems to be forest management practices, which have changed several times over the course of the past 200 years,” the study said.

The United States Forest Service, which manages most of America’s wilderness, made some big changes in the 1970s that many say have led to our modern predicament.

The selective clearing of forests, in which only certain trees are removed, had been highly successful in the past. But perverse incentives for the agency made clear-cutting, or uniformly chopping down trees, more common in the 1950s. This led to a backlash of lawsuits, environmentalist attacks, and unfortunately, more centralization in Washington for the Forest Service.

“In 1976 Congress tried to resolve the debate by instituting a comprehensive forest planning process,” wrote Randal O’Toole, a policy analyst at the Cato Institute. “The resulting plans proved to be a costly mistake: The agency spent more than a billion dollars planning the national forests, but the plans were often based on fabricated data, and they did not resolve any debates.”

Nearly a half century of bureaucratic centralization and environmentalist initiatives have left forests overgrown, vulnerable to fire, and dangerous to individual property owners and the economies of many states.

California state Sen. Mike McGuire, a Democrat, estimated that the recent fires may have caused over $3 billion in damages to his state.

California’s fires have gathered most of the media attention, but other Western states also have suffered immensely from out-of-control wildland fires in the past few years.

Last year alone, large wildfires hit nine states, including California, Colorado, Idaho, Montana, Nevada, Oregon, Utah, Washington, and Wyoming, according to The Washington Post.

“Fires nationwide have consumed 8,036,858 acres—about 12,550 square miles, larger than the size of Maryland—since Jan. 1,” the Post reported.

A large fire near the town of Brian Head, Utah, burned 13 homes and over 93 square miles of land.

Utah state Rep. Mike Noel, a Republican, along with other Utah legislators and officials, made a short video in October explaining how better forest management could have prevented what became the most expensive forest fire in the state’s history.

Read the full report here


[paypal_donation_button]

Free Range Report

[wp_ad_camp_3]

[wp_ad_camp_2]

Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on LinkedIn Share
Send email Mail
Print Print
Environment latest_news Mismanage ResourcesBrian Head fire environmentalists forest management policy wildland fires

About the author

Related Posts

December 9, 2016

House committee slams ‘absurd’ USDA catfish inspection program

May 5, 2017

Patagonia et al. looking for profits and subsidies from Antiquities Act land grabs

December 17, 2016

To delight of enviros, Obama slaps clean-power Glen Canyon Dam with expiration date

Comments

  1. Sharon Catania says:
    November 18, 2017 at 2:57 am

    Climate change is bull. These fires were set and then re-set by the BLM. There were many set fires witnessed by those that fought the fires. This is their way of destroying; not maintaining our forests.

    1. Bill D says:
      December 23, 2017 at 10:04 pm

      Sharon, in addition the BLM, Forest Service and sometimes state forestry agencies have not responded to initial reporting of fires. Many fires could have been put out while they were just a few acres or less in size. Fire fighting has turned in to big business and poor land management decision making. Most federal forested lands in western Oregon do not even log the the fire killed trees. Billions of dollars of dead trees are left to rot in the name of good environmental management. Our federal lands are no longer being managed on sustainable concepts or wise use, preservation and natural management are the newest fad. This is so sad what the social justice warriors have accomplished in the name of environmental protection. Many of the acts past by congress have created a dysfunctional land management concept, ie wild horse and burro act, endangered species act, these are just a few that have caused unworkable situations.
      Dwight Hammond and his son are in jail for 5 years for accidentally burning 34 acres of BLM land! This is insane when our agencies purposely allow wild fires to burn 100’s of thousands of acres. The swamp is everywhere!

Comments are closed.

Archives

Archives

Copyright Free Range Report. All rights reserved. | Powered by Writers Blogily Theme
Please wait...

Subscribe to our newsletter

Want to be notified when our article is published? Enter your email address and name below to be the first to know.
SIGN UP FOR NEWSLETTER NOW