Enviros gnash teeth over Trump clarification of WOTUS definition

“I think the point of this is that nobody is saying anybody cares less about water or the environment, but we finally have clear definitions of what navigable waters are. That is what we have been after for years.”

Amy Joi O’Donoghue

Deseret News

Ranchers reveling in Trump’s proposed rollback of water regulations

SALT LAKE CITY — The Trump administration’s proposed rollback of an Obama-era rule defining what waterways fall under federal jurisdiction was hailed by ranchers and private property advocates and blasted by environmental groups.

On Tuesday, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the Army Corps of Engineers released proposed revisions to the 2015 rule that was challenged by 21 states, including Utah.

American Farm Bureau President Zippy Duvall said Obama’s rule required “drastic” action by farmers and ranchers across the country, spawning a nationwide campaign called “Ditch the Rule.”

At the press event announcing the proposed revisions, Duvall said all presidents of the federation’s 50 chapters were in the room as a show of support.

“I think the government is being given back to the people through this administration,” Duvall said.

Utah Farm Bureau President Ron Gibson, who attended the EPA announcement on the proposed changes, said the revisions will provide much-needed clarity.

“I think the point of this is that nobody is saying anybody cares less about water or the environment, but we finally have clear definitions of what navigable waters are. That is what we have been after for years.”

The Obama-era rule was hotly contested in the courts before it was even put into real action.

Utah Attorney General Sean Reyes signed Utah on as the first state to join a challenge to the rule.

At the time, he called it an example of “blatant disregard for rural communities and businesses in Utah and other Western states.”

Environmental groups countered that the rule was necessary to protect water from contamination in ephemeral waterways and wetlands.

Their reaction today was swift and harsh.

“EPA and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers are attempting to reduce or eliminate Clean Water Act protections for the majority of our nation’s waters in violation of our most basic procedural and environmental laws,” said Waterkeeper Alliance senior attorney Kelly Hunter Foster. “The agencies should be working to protect the public and restore our nation’s waters — not engaging in this elaborate multiyear plot to legalize more water pollution.”

Read the full article here


Free Range Report

Thank you for reading our latest report, but before you go…

Our loyalty is to the truth and to YOU, our readers!
We respect your reading experience, and have refrained from putting up a paywall and obnoxious advertisements, which means that we get by on small donations from people like you. We’re not asking for much, but any amount that you can give goes a long way to securing a better future for the people who make America great.

[paypal_donation_button]

For as little as $1 you can support Free Range Report, and it takes only a moment.

About the author